Interested in more news on the Right to Die? ERGO circulates on a regular basis an electronic newslist with news from around the world.
Just received the message that Truus Postma (retired GP who in 1972 applied euthanasia on the seriously ill mother died in December last year. She was picked up by the police, the villagers of Noordwolde came massively in action. Still she was prosecuted and her case (resulting in 1 week suspended sentence) in 1973 became world news.
Read an interesting article on communication around the end-of-life. When debating end-of-life care, many times these debates are limited to a "yes or no" towards assisted (aid) in dying. We tend to forget that the end-of-life starts earlier then the moment where doctors say
In a position paper from 2011, the Royal Dutch Medical Association (RDMA) ascertained that physicians must be better trained to provide guidance to patients who choose to stop eating and drinking. Today the RDMA - together with the Dutch Nurses' Association - issued a guideline to
Ole Peder Kjeldstadli, chair of the Norwegian RtD Society Foreningen Retten til en Verdig Død, commented in Dagbladet on an article by Karsten Hytten and Svein Aarseth concerning the practice of euthanasia in Norway. After explaining the differences between passive and active euthanasia, Kjelstadli says “…when the right to self-determination, in principle, is legally respected when it comes to passive euthanasia, it is in my opinion inconsistent not to respect the self-determination when there is talk of (active) euthanasia”. He continues
An opinion article (by Rob Jonquière)
The request for and announcements around the euthanasia of Belgian prisoner has released tons of publications and debates around the world. At the centre of these discussions was of course the issue whether this was the definite proof of the so much feared slippery slope, or whether it demonstrated the legal and juridical strength of the law. Summarizing
HAARETZ: The recent Tel Aviv District Court ruling allowing a patient with terminal amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS, also called Lou Gehrig's disease) to end his life is a courageous decision. It advances the rights of an individual vis-a-vis his life and death, above and beyond the 2005 Dying Patient Law, which allows a person to refuse life-saving medical treatment only if their life expectancy is less than six months.
Last year, the B.C. Government forged an all-party committee to study how the province’s healthcare system can be improved. As part of its research, the Select Standing Committee on Health reached out to B.C. residents for input on a number of healthcare-related questions — including the future of end-of-life care in the province. Read here Dying with Dignity Canada's Submission to B.C.'s Select Standing on Health.
The European Court of Human Rights (ECHR) will deliberate this week on the fate of Vincent Lambert, the 38 year old quadriplegic currently being in a vegetative state. The Strasbourg judges will consider the case at a hearing. The hearing concerns teh conflict between his wife Rachel, who wishes to "let him go" and his parents, who refuse to stop the feeding and artificial hydration of their son.
The parents challenge the decision
La Cour européenne des droits de l'Homme (CEDH) se penche mercredi sur le sort de Vincent Lambert, ce tétraplégique de 38 ans plongé dans un état végétatif. Les juges de Strasbourg vont examiner, lors d'une audience, le conflit entre son épouse Rachel, qui souhaite le "laisser partir", et ses parents, qui refusent l'arrêt de l'alimentation et de l'hydratation artificielles de leur fils. Mais il faudra encore attendre pour connaître l'épilogue de ce feuilleton judiciaire à rebondissements, la Grande chambre de la CEDH ne devant rendre son arrêt que dans au moins un à deux mois.